Supply Chain Audit
End-to-end cost and efficiency diagnostic across your supply chain
ExploreStrategic supply chain advisory from practitioners - not theorists.
Vistar's consultancy practice draws on 200+ years of collective operational experience to deliver supply chain strategies that work in the real world - from diagnostic audit to full deployment.
Supply chain consultancy divides broadly into two kinds. One is analytical: build a model of the network, optimise it, hand over the recommendation. The other starts from the constraint that whoever receives the recommendation has to run it on Monday with the people, systems and sites they already have.
Both have their place, and the first is genuinely better at problems with a mathematical answer - where to site a hub, how to balance inventory across locations. The second tends to be more useful where the obstacle is not the design but the transition: a plan that is correct and undeliverable produces no saving at all.
The distinction shows up in what the deliverable looks like. An analytical engagement typically ends with a model and a target state. An operator-led engagement should end with a sequence - what changes first, what has to be true before the next step, and which measures will show whether it worked.
An audit that returns a list of observations has not finished. The useful output is a small number of changes ranked by the effort required against the benefit expected, with the assumptions behind each one written down so they can be challenged.
That means the audit has to look at the flows rather than the functions. Cost rarely sits inside a department; it accumulates at the handoffs - between procurement and inbound transport, between the warehouse and the production plan, between dispatch and the customer's receiving window. An audit organised by department will find local inefficiencies and miss the expensive ones.
It should also be explicit about what it did not examine. Scope boundaries stated up front are what make the findings usable later, when someone asks whether a recommendation accounted for a constraint the audit never looked at.
Freight rates attract the most negotiating attention because they are the most visible line. They are seldom where the largest recoverable cost sits.
More usually it is in the structure: how many times material is handled between supplier and line, how much inventory the network holds to absorb its own unreliability, how much premium freight is spent correcting problems created upstream. Each of those is a consequence of a design decision rather than a price, and none of them improves through procurement pressure.
This is why cost-to-serve analysis and network optimisation are usually more productive starting points than a rate review. A network that handles material once instead of three times has removed the cost permanently; a renegotiated rate has moved it to a supplier who will seek it back at renewal.
Defined scope and fixed timeline - suited to a network redesign, a WMS selection or a supply chain audit. Typical duration 6-16 weeks.
Ongoing strategic support with monthly KPI reviews, an improvement roadmap and escalation support. Minimum six-month engagement.
Consultants work inside your operation full time - suited to large transformation programmes or post-merger integration.